Fenty Beauty rose from Rihanna’s vision in 2017 and turned the beauty world upside down with a foundation line that claimed to serve everyone. Its early promise was wall-to-wall inclusivity: hundreds of shades, bold campaigns, and the message that all skin deserves representation. The packaging is sleek, the marketing is loud, and the social feed is a crowd of voices trying to scream inclusion.
Over time, Fenty Beauty leaned harder into activist imagery. Beyond makeup, the brand now wraps itself in DEI language, partnerships, and cause marketing. The message is clear: your skin tone is part of a social statement. But as with many beauty-to-activism hybrids, the question lingers: is it real change, or just well‑branded virtue?
Fenty Beauty released a highlighter named “Geisha Chic,” which drew backlash for fetishizing Japanese culture. Under pressure, they pulled it and apologized. That’s a textbook case of virtue‑marketing backfiring: you try to look worldly, and end up walking it back.
Once hailed as the revolution in beauty, Fenty’s “effect” is now being questioned. Critics say many inclusivity moves were superficial: more shades, yes, but lacking deeper support like undertone variety or matching lines. When you preach “inclusion” but leave gaps behind, customers see it.
Fenty’s sister line Savage X Fenty launched Pride capsule collections featuring LGBTQ+ models and donated a portion of proceeds to organizations like GLAAD. The messaging frames the brand as a true ally, though critics warn rainbow products often mean rainbow pricing.